![]() |
|
| BURG Newsletter | No. 14, January 14, 2008 |
Just waiting...
Regardless of Judge Turk's decision, we expect the case to be appealed by the losing side to the Virginia Supreme Court. This is because the BZA's ruling went into uncharted waters beyond existing law and legal precedent. If it stands, the ruling would change Virginia law, allowing developers to lock in vested rights based on vague and open-ended rezonings. Stay tuned... |
|
|
|
Thanks to everyone who voiced their traffic concernsIn the end, working together with the town, we concluded that there was no clear evidence that the submitted study gave an underestimate of the traffic impacts of the development. But our added scrutiny forced numerous changes in the traffic study, and generated a new awareness of this issue. Thanks to our work, and yours, in bringing attention to this issue, Town Council is now discussing changes to the town code that would protect us from excessive traffic impacts. Even granting that the developers fulfilled their legal obligations for traffic study and traffic improvements, it is clear that the S. Main project, if built as planned, will lead to a major deterioration in traffic conditions. The project is expected to generate 20,000 new car trips each day. Roughly 3000 of those will be travelling Country Club Road through the Airport and Country Club intersection by Margaret Beeks. That intersection will be reduced from a Level of Service of B, to D, the next-to lowest grade. Delays on Country Club Eastbound at S. Main Street will double. All of these projections are for the first year of the project, and will only get worse from there. Big box stores generate more traffic per square foot than other kinds of retail, and much more than residential uses. See the final traffic study here (it's a big file). |
|
Read a brand-new U. of California study that measures Wal-mart's role in bringing down wages across the U.S. |
|
| Click here to forward this to a friend. Click here to remove yourself from the BURG list. | |